The device – which uses an approach called trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS) – was cleared for use by the US Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) to treat ADHD in 2019 based on a small study. These new findings from a larger multicentre trial, published in the journal Nature Medicine, suggest authorities should revisit the original evidence that supported the FDA clearance. Notably, TNS is currently not recommended for use in the UK by NICE guidelines.

The trial was run in collaboration with University of Southampton and funded by a partnership between the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) and Medical Research Council (MRC) with further support from the NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre.

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) affects 5-8 per cent of school-age children worldwide and is associated with age-inappropriate problems with attention and/or hyperactivity and impulsivity that can impair everyday functioning. Stimulant medications improve symptoms in 70 % of those who take them in the short term but there is less evidence of their long-term effects.

To provide an alternative to medication researchers have developed and trialled approaches that use non-invasive stimulation of the brain, working on the regions that have been identified as influential in ADHD.

One of these approaches involves stimulating the trigeminal nerve (TNS), targeting a branch of this facial nerve which is thought to activate the brainstem and from there other brain regions that may be relevant to ADHD, in particular the locus coeruleus, which plays a role in arousal which is typically diminished in people with ADHD. TNS is thought to stimulate other brain regions associated with attention such as frontal and thalamic areas via the brainstem in a bottom-up manner.

A previous small trial in the US with 62 children diagnosed with ADHD has shown that when TNS is applied every night for 8 hours for one month it is effective in reducing symptoms – this research led to its clearance by the FDA for use in the US. However, the control condition involved no stimulation and blinding was not tested after one month, raising questions about a potential placebo effect.

This new UK clinical trial across two sites in London and Southampton tested TNS in a wider range of 150 children and adolescents diagnosed with ADHD aged between 8 and 18 years old and applied a more rigorous placebo condition. Half of the sample received real TNS for about 9 hours every night for 4 weeks through battery-powered electrodes applied to the forehead. The other half of the sample received the ‘sham’ condition where electrodes were still applied to the forehead every night for 4 weeks but participants only received 30 seconds of stimulation every hour at a lower frequency and pulse width, which are thought to be non-effective and hence act as a “control” condition.

Professor Katya Rubia, Professor of Cognitive Neuroscience at the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King’s College London and senior author of the study said: “Our study shows how important it is to design an appropriate placebo condition in clinical trials of brain therapies. There is a large placebo effect with high-tech brain therapies, in particular for patients and families that have an expectation that they can adjust brain differences associated with ADHD. It is hence paramount to control for placebo effects in modern brain therapies to avoid false hopes.”

Dr Aldo Conti, postdoctoral researcher at IoPPN and at Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King’s College London and first author on the study said: “This multicentre trial was designed to address key limitations of the previous pilot study that informed FDA clearance of TNS for ADHD, particularly by using a rigorously controlled sham condition that supported successful blinding across the treatment period. Unlike the earlier study, which was limited to younger children, we also included adolescents, a clinically important group given well-documented challenges with long-term medication adherence. These design choices enabled a more robust and clinically relevant evaluation of TNS.”

By comparing the groups researchers evaluated effectiveness of TNS by assessing the symptoms of ADHD as reported by parents, alongside other outcomes such as mind-wandering and attention, depression and anxiety, and sleep.

The trial showed that TNS was safe with no serious adverse events and most participants considered it a mild or no burden to use. However, the results showed no significant change in ADHD symptoms, objective measures of hyperactivity, attention and associated behaviours around mood and sleep.

Professor Samuele Cortese, NIHR Research Professor at University of Southampton and study lead for the Southampton site, stated: “Rigorous evidence, such as that generated by this study, is essential for supporting shared decision-making regarding interventions for ADHD. It empowers individuals with ADHD and their families to make informed choices about the treatment of ADHD. Clinicians, individuals with ADHD, and their families need to know which treatments work, and which do not based on the best evidence.”

This project was funded by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) Programme which is a partnership of the Medical Research Council (MRC) and National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). The trial was run by the King’s Clinical Trials Unit and recruitment involved the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) clinics within the following NHS trusts: South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare (previously known as SOLENT NHS Trust), Central and North-West London NHS Foundation Trust, Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust and South-West London and St. George’s Mental Health NHS Trust.

External trigeminal nerve stimulation in youth with ADHD: a randomized, sham-controlled, phase 2b trial by Conti, A.A. et al was published in Nature Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-04075-x

Held annually, the Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health (ACAMH) Awards aim to recognise high quality work in evidence based science, both in publication and practice, in the field of child and adolescent mental health. Receiving a nomination is prestigious recognition of work that is at the forefront of the advancement of child and adolescent mental health research, and clinical practice. 

Dr Gonzalo Salazar De Pablo wins Kathy Sylva ‘Rising Star’ Award

The Kathy Sylva ‘Rising Star’ Award is presented to someone who has made a significant scientific contribution to child and adolescent mental health literature, within 10 years of their first peer reviewed journal publication.

The 2025 Award was presented to Dr Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo, Senior Clinical Lecturer in the Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, honorary Consultant Child & Adolescent Psychiatrist at the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and part of the King’s Maudsley Partnership for Children & Young People. It was presented in recognition of his outstanding scientific contributions to child and adolescent mental health.

Dr Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo’s research focuses on the early identification and prediction of bipolar disorder and psychosis in young people, advancing the field through high-impact publications.

The nomination highlighted his exceptional productivity, international collaborations, and leadership. A defining feature of Dr Salazar de Pablo’s work is his commitment to co-production with young people, families, and clinicians, ensuring that research questions and interventions are grounded in lived experience and real-world clinical needs. Receiving this award is a meaningful recognition of his work and his contributions to child and adolescent mental health.

Looking ahead, he hopes to continue developing equitable, accessible, and youth-informed approaches that improve early intervention and long-term outcomes for children and adolescents worldwide.

Lionel Hersov Memorial Award presented to RE-STAR

The Lionel Hersov Memorial Award is given to a practice or research team that has either demonstrated the translation of an evidence base into clinical practice with measurable clinical impact, or demonstrated quality improvement within either clinical or research practice.

This year, it was presented to RE-STAR Academic Researchers (Ars) and its Youth Researcher Panel (Y-RP), a four-year interdisciplinary programme led by researchers from the Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, and part of the King’s Maudsley Partnership at King’s College London with UCL, Anna Freud and Centre.

RE-STAR, led by Professor Edmund Sonunga-Barke, explores the interplay between autism and/or ADHD traits, exposure to environmental stressors, and emotional responding in neurodivergent young people, in driving developmental pathways to depression.

The programme works closely with its Youth Researcher Panel, who play an integral role in the planning and delivery of RE-STAR, and contribute to the project in a wide variety of ways, working alongside the academic researchers as ‘co-researchers’, co-analysing and collecting data, and helping to share and communicate the work of RE-STAR to a wider audience.

RE-STAR is funded by UKRI Medical Research Council.

Celebrating the award wins, Head of Department for Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Professor Philip Shaw, said, “I know that all in the King’s Maudsley Partnership join me in congratulating the award winners and those nominated, and a shout out also to others at KMP who were nominated, the awardees showcase how King’s Maudsley Partnership strives to infuse research into clinical care, and will enrich our research through clinical insights and experience.”

Alongside these wins, we’re delighted to recognise Dr. Josefien Breedvelt who was also nominated for the Rising Star award, and Mr Sangwoo Richard Jung, shortlisted for Clinical Trainee of the Year.