£4.5M awarded to South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust for cutting-edge research equipment and technology

£4.5M awarded to South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust for cutting-edge research equipment and technology

£4.5M awarded to South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust for cutting-edge research equipment and technology

The National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) has awarded more than £4.5 million to South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust to pay for new research equipment and technology.

a young girl holding a leaf

This will be used to improve the accessibility of the Trust’s research so more patients and service users have the opportunity to take part in research. It will include a new sleep laboratory, equipment for the Informatics theme of the NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre and resources for the new Pears Maudsley Centre for Children and Young People.

New sleep laboratory at the NIHR King’s Clinical Research Facility (CRF)

This investment will allow the creation of a sleep laboratory to study the impact of disturbed sleep on brain functioning and mental health. This will be based in the NIHR King’s Clinical Research Facility and the funding will refurbish existing space for private rooms and purchase new equipment designed for sleep studies. When not used for sleep research, these new facilities will be available as generic clinical space for experimental medicine, thus increasing our capacity for studies across the CRF’s portfolio.

The sleep laboratory will be a leader in this field, building on existing strengths in the development of both silent and motion insensitive MRI, relationships with industry and the UK’s largest clinical sleep service that spans across King’s Health Partners

Pears Maudsley Centre for Children and Young People

The equipment and facilities of the Pears Maudsley Centre for Children and Young People will revolutionize the type and scope of research undertaken, enhancing our understanding of the relationship between brain-based mechanisms, clinical disorders, and social context.

This funding will pay for an MRI compatible EEG system for imaging infants to be used in perinatal services and additional eye tracking equipment that is specifically helpful for younger children who find it difficult to sit still during data capture.

The equipment will enable researchers to explore the interplay between brain and social/environmental risk factors such as trauma exposure, poverty, parental mental illness with an aim to investigate potential prevention targets.

NIHR Maudsley BRC Informatics

The funding will provide dedicated BRC storage and high-performance computing facilities to enable the informatics team to process large datasets. This hardware will enhance research capacity and capability, supporting the development of large language models and increasing the speed of testing of deep learning models. It will also support the creation of a  Mobile Health and Speech Lab which  include a collection of devices and speech equipment to ensure a standardised process for testing, benchmarking, piloting, and evaluating existing and emerging devices for data collection.

“We are delighted that the NIHR has chosen to award £4.5m to South London and Maudsley. It will fund equipment for our new Pears Maudsley Centre for Children and Young People to enable our academics and clinicians to continue their world-leading research into the prevention and treatment of mental illness.”

David Bradley

Chief Executive Officer, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust

“This investment will allow us to purchase equipment, technology and hardware, across the NIHR Maudsley BRC, NIHR King’s CRF and for the Pears Maudsley Centre. Not only will this enhance our research capacity and capability, it will also improve the experience of participants in research, particularly children and people with mental health conditions, because our facilities have been designed with their needs in mind.  We are delighted that our application was considered excellent by the NIHR committee.”

Professor Matthew Hotopf

CBE FRCPsych FMedSci, Director of the NIHR Maudsley BRC, and Vice Dean (Research), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London

Follow Us

For the latest updates and news, follow us on our social channels.

When bad experiences trigger anxiety: childhood trauma and PTSD

When bad experiences trigger anxiety: childhood trauma and PTSD

When bad experiences trigger anxiety: childhood trauma and PTSD
Professor Andrea Danese

Professor Andrea Danese

Professor of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and Consultant Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist

Shockingly, up to 80% of children are exposed to trauma by the age of 18 in the UK. With the theme of World Mental Health Awareness Week being ‘anxiety’, we have an opportunity to unpack how childhood trauma can lead to anxiety – and in some of the more serious cases, a particular type of anxiety disorder called Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).

a young girl holding a leaf

Traumas are events that involve danger of death, serious injury or sexual assault. After experiencing trauma, it’s not unusual for children to develop emotional and behavioural symptoms: they might become tearful, upset or clingy; struggle to pay attention or to sleep; or even get headaches and tummy aches. This is a normal psychological response and not a psychiatric disorder. However, by age 18, around one in four children exposed to trauma will have developed PTSD. This means they will begin to experience very severe, impairing or persistent symptoms, such as re-living the trauma, developing avoidance strategies, and experiencing physiological hyper-arousal.

Because not all children who experience trauma develop PTSD, it is important to understand how to identify the more vulnerable children in order to provide adequate support and treatment. Through my work in the Stress & Development Lab at King’s College London’s Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), my team and I aim to understand how traumatic experiences in childhood affect mental and physical health, how to identify those children at greatest risk of developing PTSD, and how to support children who have experienced trauma.

How traumatic experiences in childhood affect health

In PTSD, abnormal processing of traumatic memories leads to persistent re-experiencing of the event through unwanted and distressing memories or nightmares, particularly when there are triggers that resemble the context in which the traumatic event occurred.

Traumatic experiences require significant adaptations by the developing child. At a molecular level, the hormonal and immune systems are overactive to support facing or escaping from danger and recovering from injuries. At a neurobiological level, the brain becomes more aware of potential threats. At the psychological level, the traumatic experiences are encoded in autobiographical memories to minimise future threats. At the social level, the threats in the environment may lead to withdrawal and reduction in social connections.

The association of childhood maltreatment with biomarkers of inflammation. Graph from ‘Childhood maltreatment predicts adult inflammation in a life-course study’, Danese et al. (2007).

Although these adaptations can be helpful to reduce threats, they may lead over time to maladaptive outcomes including mental health problems. For example, inflammation levels are higher in individuals who have experienced maltreatment compared to those who haven’t, and are associated with mental health problems later on.

In the Stress & Development Lab, we have conducted several detailed epidemiological studies based on large population-based birth cohorts to, firstly, investigate the impact of childhood trauma exposure on mental health outcomes, and secondly, identify which children are most at risk of developing PTSD.

Through analyses in the Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study (which observed twins born between 1994-95 until they were aged 18 years), in a paper led by Dr Stephanie Lewis, Clinical Lecturer at the IoPPN, we found that children with PTSD are eight times more likely to self-harm and 10 times more likely to attempt suicide than those without PTSD. In absolute terms, this means that about half of children with PTSD report self-harming and one in five report attempting suicide. Children with PTSD are also significantly more likely to have a violent offence record and not be in education, employment or training (NEET). This is alongside being at increased risk of co-occurring psychiatric diagnoses, including depression, generalised anxiety disorder, conduct problems, substance misuse or attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

 

These findings highlight that childhood traumas are key modifiable risk factors for psychopathology in childhood and onwards – if we target the processes involved in responding to trauma, we may then be able to reduce the prevalence of mental health disorders and other negative health outcomes. As a result, childhood trauma is a major focus for research and clinical practice in mental health.

How to identify children most at risk of PTSD

We know that childhood trauma is associated with negative outcomes. But why are some children resilient in the face of trauma, while others develop complex psychopathologies like PTSD?

From our research, we have identified several key factors which influence the risk of developing PTSD in individual children exposed to trauma. Firstly, the quantity and nature of the trauma has an impact: children exposed to more traumatic events are at greater risk of developing persistent PTSD. In particular, those children who are exposed to ‘interpersonal traumas’ (such as physical or sexual assault) are more likely to develop PTSD than children exposed to ‘non-interpersonal traumas’ (such as accidents or natural disasters).

Secondly, individual differences in the child impact risk for PTSD: research suggests that girls are at greater risk of developing PTSD than boys following trauma. Different children also have different responses both during and after trauma: during the trauma, children who believed that they were about to die, and those who believe they are to blame for the occurrence of the traumatic event, may be at greater risk for developing PTSD. Children who try to cope with trauma by pushing memories away, withdrawing or distracting themselves may also be more likely to develop PTSD.

Interestingly, the memory of trauma also influences risk of developing mental health problems. Research has shown that individuals who were maltreated as children but do not have memories of these experiences have the same rates of mental health problems as individuals who were not maltreated individuals. This suggests that biases in memory, core beliefs, and decision-making influence risk for PTSD and other psychiatric responses to trauma.

Autobiographical memory may be a risk factor for trauma-related psychopathology. The subjective experience (‘s’) of child maltreatment (including memory) is more strongly associated with psychopathology than the objective experience (‘o’) measured through official court records. Graph from ‘Objective and subjective experiences of child maltreatment and their relationships with psychopathology’, Danese & Spatz Widom (2020).

Although these factors are more common in groups of children who develop PTSD than those who do not develop PTSD, much more research is still needed to make accurate risk prediction for individual children.

Dr Alan Meehan, Lecturer in Psychology at the IoPPN, and others in my team are working to develop accurate prediction models to identify which trauma-exposed children are at greatest risk of developing psychopathology. This will enable interventions from the earliest stages, even before symptoms occur, in children who have experienced trauma.

Identifying the symptoms of PTSD and what we can do to reduce them

Many children (around 50%) fail to recover from the symptoms of PTSD without treatment. Yet, despite the high prevalence of trauma in childhood, our research found that only a small fraction of children who have PTSD end up seeing a GP or mental health professionals. Around one in three sought help from a GP and only one in five, ultimately, were in contact with a mental health professional. This seems to be because children can struggle to report the symptoms or even the traumatic experiences themselves, and it’s difficult for parents and teachers to really understand when a child has developed PTSD.

 

As part of my work to reduce the negative impact of childhood trauma and PTSD, I co-lead the National & Specialist CAMHS Clinic for Trauma, Anxiety, and Depression at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, where we deliver assessment and treatment to children and adolescents who experience severe and/or treatment-resistant PTSD, anxiety disorders and depression.

The Maudsley Hosptital

When we undertake assessments of PTSD in children who have been exposed to traumatic experiences, we look at a cluster of symptoms that are typical of developing PTSD. For example, asking:

  • Does the child relive traumatic experiences through distressing memories or nightmares?
  • Do they show avoidance of anything that reminds them of their trauma, such as context or people that reminds them of their trauma?
  • Do they express feelings of guilt, isolation or detachment?
  • Do they still feel under threat, as we can understand because they continue expressing irritability, impulsivity or difficulty concentrating, for example?

There are several evidence-based psychological treatments for PTSD in children that have been endorsed by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and that we use in the CAMHS Clinic. These include trauma-focused psychotherapies which target cognitive and behavioural factors that contribute to the reinforcement of PTSD. These therapies generally include psychoeducation to provide information to children and families about PTSD symptoms and the treatment rationale, coping skills training to better manage intense negative emotions, gradual exposure to trauma memories and reminders to address avoidance and build a coherent trauma narrative, and cognitive restructuring to address biased appraisals related to the trauma memory. Consultant Clinical Psychologist and Reader, Dr Patrick Smith, and others at IoPPN have developed one form of this evidence-based treatment.

There is also limited but growing evidence to indicate that eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR), which involves recalling traumatic events while performing tasks that generate bilateral sensory stimulation, may be beneficial for young people with PTSD.

Barriers to support and how to overcome them

We know it is impossible to implement interventions if child trauma and trauma-related psychopathology go undetected. As a result, our team is currently trying to map barriers to access healthcare to improve recognition of PTSD in children and adolescents.

One of the barriers to getting professional support for childhood PTSD are the symptoms and thought patterns themselves. Children may experience trauma-related avoidance, low motivation, hopelessness, distrust, shame, guilt, or fear of not being believed or being reprimanded by the perpetrators of the trauma. These factors may make them less likely to open up about the traumatic event or how they are feeling.

Another key barrier relates to the parents or caregivers’ response to their child’s trauma. For example, deliberate concealment of trauma by perpetrators or to avoid reprisal by perpetrators, fear of being blamed, fear of having their child taken by child protective services, or poor understanding and stigma around mental health. There may also be structural barriers, including lack of insurance, access to mental health care facilities or transportation.

Family can act as a great support system for children exposed to trauma. Children who received a family intervention which taught parents and caregivers about trauma symptoms, how to improve family communication, and coping skills to manage symptoms were significantly less likely to have a PTSD diagnosis three months after the intervention.

It is also important to remember that PTSD is not the only or even the most common mental health problem in children exposed to traumatic events, and parents and professionals need to also monitor symptoms of other anxiety disorders, depression and substance misuse in particular.

The future of mental health care and research: The King’s Maudsley Partnership for Children and Young People

Through his work in the Stress & Development Lab and National & Specialist CAMHS Clinic for Trauma, Anxiety, and Depression, Professor Andrea Danese is one of the many experts who are transforming our understanding and treatment of young people’s mental health as part of the King’s Maudsley Partnership for Children and Young People. The Partnership, which will have its home in the Pears Maudsley Centre for Children and Young People, is a unique collaboration between specialist clinicians from the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and leading academics at King’s College London.

Together, King’s and The Trust host the largest group of mental health scientists and clinical academics in Europe. Through the Partnership, clinicians and researchers will collaborate even more closely to find new ways to predict, prevent and treat mental health disorders, such as childhood trauma and PTSD. This will enable us to translate research into practical treatments in the shortest possible time, and will benefit children locally, nationally and across the globe.

The Pears Maudsley Centre for Children and Young People

Follow Us

For the latest updates and news, follow us on our social channels.

Online cognitive training not effective in reducing ADHD symptoms

Online cognitive training not effective in reducing ADHD symptoms

Online cognitive training not effective in reducing ADHD symptoms

A major review of research led by the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN) at King’s College London and the University of Southampton, on behalf of the European ADHD Guidelines Group (EAGG), found little to no evidence that computerised cognitive training brings benefits for people with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

a young girl holding a leaf

Computerised cognitive training is an online tool designed to improve cognitive processes such as short-term memory, attention and inhibitory control (the ability to control your attention, behaviour, thoughts and emotions). It has been proposed as a treatment option to help reduce symptoms of hyperactivity/impulsivity and inattention at the core of ADHD.

The review team conducted a meta-analysis of 36 randomised controlled trials (studies in which people are randomly assigned to different groups to test a specific intervention) investigating the effects of computerised cognitive training on outcomes in individuals with ADHD. The study, published in Molecular Psychiatry from the Nature Group, found that cognitive training did not lead to clinically meaningful reductions in overall ADHD symptoms or on specific hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms. It may, however, result in a small improvement in inattention in some settings.

“We conducted the largest, most comprehensive meta-analysis of randomised control trials to date to investigate the efficacy of computerised cognitive training in reducing ADHD symptoms. Our meta-analysis revealed little to no support for the use of this cognitive training as a stand-alone intervention for ADHD symptoms. Although small, short-term effects on inattention symptoms were found, they were likely of limited clinical importance. Overall, I think it’s now time to seek out new interventions targeting different processes.”

Dr Samuel Westwood

Lecturer in Psychology Education at King’s IoPPN and lead author of the paper

In most trials, participants completed the computerised cognitive training at home. Some completed the training at school, in a laboratory, a clinic/hospital or a mixed setting (switching between multiple). There were some improvements in a limited set of cognitive processes – particularly working memory (the ability to hold in mind and manipulate information over the short term) following specific working memory training. This may be of benefit to the subset of individuals with ADHD and who also experience working memory difficulties.

The authors explain that the findings do not support the use of computerised cognitive training in its current form as a stand-alone treatment for ADHD symptoms, and that new approaches that target different processes should be explored to develop effective interventions for ADHD.

Professor Edmund Sonuga-Barke, Professor of Developmental Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience at King’s IoPPN and joint senior author of the paper, said: “ADHD is a very heterogeneous condition in terms of what brain processes are implicated. It is likely that different sorts of interventions are required by different people. New and innovative approaches will be needed to move the field forward.”

Professor Samuele Cortese, Chair of the EAGG, Professor of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry at the University of Southampton and joint senior author of the paper, said: “Rigorous meta-analytic evidence such as this one is crucial to inform the development of clinical guidelines, with the ultimate goal to provide the best evidence-based treatments to individuals with ADHD”.

Computerized cognitive training in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with blinded and objective outcomes’ (Samuel Westwood, Valeria Parlatini, Katya Rubia, Samuele Cortese, Edmund Sonuga-Barke, European ADHD Guidelines Group) was published in Molecular Psychiatry (DOI:10.1038/s41380-023-02000-7).

For more information, please contact Amelia Remmington (IoPPN Communications and Engagement Officer).

Follow Us

For the latest updates and news, follow us on our social channels.

Hyperactivity and impulsivity in childhood associated with increased risk of social isolation

Hyperactivity and impulsivity in childhood associated with increased risk of social isolation

Hyperactivity and impulsivity in childhood associated with increased risk of social isolation

Research led by the Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry (SGDP) Centre at the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King’s College London, has found that children who show heightened hyperactivity or impulsivity have an increased risk of experiencing social isolation as they get older.

a young girl holding a leaf

The study, published in the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (JAACAP) Open, investigated the associations between symptoms of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and social isolation throughout childhood.

Using data from the Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study, mother- and teacher-reported social isolation and ADHD symptoms of hyperactivity/impulsivity and inattention were measured in 2232 British children at ages five, seven, 10 and 12.

Researchers found that children who showed increased ADHD symptoms had a greater risk of becoming isolated later in childhood. When investigating the two sets of ADHD symptoms separately, they found children who were more hyperactive were at increased risk of experiencing social isolation as they got older. Whereas symptoms of inattention alone were not associated with social isolation.

“Using data from a large longitudinal study, we found that children who showed ADHD symptoms in childhood – particularly hyperactivity or impulsivity – were more likely to experience social isolation later on.”

Katherine Thompson

PhD student at the SGDP Centre and lead author of the study

Katherine Thompson continued: “Negative interactions with their peers may lead children with ADHD to become withdrawn, rejected, lonely and isolated. A focus on combating negative biases around neurodiversity in schools and local communities could help reduce experiences of social isolation for these children. Our findings suggest that social isolation should be carefully assessed in children with ADHD and that they could benefit from interventions aimed at increasing social participation and easing social challenges.”

Previous research suggested that socially isolated children could be at risk for heightened symptoms of ADHD. However, this new research finds that this is not the case. Here, the researchers used more complex methods to account for each individual’s pre-existing characteristics and accurately assess both directions of the association between ADHD symptoms and social isolation within the same model.

“Research suggests children with ADHD symptoms can find it difficult to register social cues and establish friendships. These social difficulties can be detrimental to many forms of physical and mental health. Our study highlights the importance in enhancing peer social support and inclusion for children with ADHD, particularly in school settings.”

Professor Louise Arseneault

Professor of Developmental Psychology at the SGDP Centre and senior author of the study

The study received funding support from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the Jacobs Foundation. Katherine Thompson is funded by the London Interdisciplinary Social Science Doctoral Training Partnership (LISS DTP) through the Economic and Social Research Council. The E-Risk Longitudinal Twin Study is funded by the UKRI Medical Research Council.

Do children with ADHD symptoms become socially isolated? Longitudinal within-person associations in a nationally representative cohort’ (Katherine Thompson, Jessica Agnew-Blais, Andrea Allegrini, Bridget Bryan, Andrea Danese, Candice Odgers, Timothy Matthews, and Louise Arseneault) was published in the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (JAACAP) Open (DOI: 10.1016/j.jaacop.2023.02.001).

For more information, please contact Patrick O’Brien (IoPPN’s Senior Media Officer).

Follow Us

For the latest updates and news, follow us on our social channels.

Co-occurring parental depression symptoms in infancy linked with child emotional difficulties in early adolescence

Co-occurring parental depression symptoms in infancy linked with child emotional difficulties in early adolescence

Co-occurring parental depression symptoms in infancy linked with child emotional difficulties in early adolescence

New research from the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN) at King’s College London has found when one parent experiences guilt as a symptom of depression during their child’s infancy, it triggers depression symptoms in the other parent and goes on to impact the child’s emotional wellbeing.

a young girl holding a leaf

The paper, published in the British Journal of Psychiatry, found that when one parent experienced the specific depression symptom, guilt, during their child’s infancy, this activated symptoms of depression in the other parent and had a further knock-on effect on child emotional wellbeing during early adolescence.

Researchers studied 4,492 mother–father–child trios from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), a large group of 14,000 families in England. Parents self-reported their depression symptoms when their child was 21 months old, and mother-reported child emotional difficulties were measured when the child was age nine, 11 and 13.

The findings suggest that specific symptom ‘cascades’ from parent, to parent, to child, are central for co-occurring depression in parents and increased vulnerability in children, providing potential targets for interventions.

Alex Martin, research associate at King’s IoPPN and lead author of the study said: “Symptoms of depression can often co-occur in mothers and fathers, and together can have a substantial impact on their child’s emotional wellbeing. However, little is understood about symptom-level mechanisms underlying the co-occurrence of depression symptoms in families.”

“Our study used network analysis – a method which identifies clusters of traits and analyses how they influence one another – to identify specific symptoms that can pass between parents and are associated with later child emotional difficulties. We found that guilt, in particular, appeared to ‘cascade’ from parent, to parent, to child.”

Alex Martin

research associate at King’s IoPPN and lead author of the study

Alex Martin continued: “Becoming a parent is one of the biggest transitions most people will experience. Of course, most people want to be the best parent they can which can create a huge pressure, sometimes manifesting in overwhelming feelings of guilt. Our findings suggest that these feelings may have a long-lasting negative impact on children as they grow up.”

When exploring the impact of parental depression symptoms on later child emotional wellbeing, the researchers found that, for mothers, guilt, anhedonia (the inability to feel pleasure), panic and sadness were highly connected with child emotional difficulties. The authors propose that this may be explained in part by the impact of depression on mothers’ parenting and the transmission of depressive thinking styles from mothers to their children.

For fathers, only the symptom of feeling overwhelmed was directly associated with child emotional difficulties. However, guilt and anhedonia in fathers appeared to be indirectly associated with child emotional difficulties when mothers were also experiencing these same symptoms.

By investigating mother and father depression at the symptom level, the researchers identified specific symptoms that may play a role in mutually reinforcing and activating depression symptoms between parents. When experienced by one parent, thoughts about self-harm also triggered and reinforced depression symptoms in the other parent but did not go on to impact the child’s later emotional wellbeing.

Professor Ted Barker, Professor in Development and Psychopathology at King’s IoPPN and senior author on the study, said: “The symptom of feeling guilty seems to play a particularly important role in familial transmission of depression, acting as a reinforcing bridge between parents, and providing a pathway from father to mother to child.”

“Guilt, as well as the other symptoms identified in this study, may therefore provide clinical targets when depression co-occurs between parents. By reducing these influential symptoms, it may reduce the activation of the wider network of depression between parents.”

Professor Ted Barker

Professor in Development and Psychopathology at King’s IoPPN and senior author on the study

This study was funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development and the Economic and Social Research Council.

For more information, please contact Amelia Remmington (IoPPN Communications and Engagement Officer).

Mother and father depression symptoms and child emotional difficulties: a network model (Alex F. Martin, Barbara Maughan, Deniz Konac and Edward D. Barker) (DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2023.8) was published in the British Journal of Psychiatry.

Follow Us

For the latest updates and news, follow us on our social channels.

Is ADHD being over-diagnosed?

Is ADHD being over-diagnosed?

Is ADHD being over-diagnosed?

In conversation with Sarah Montague on BBCRadio4 World at One, Professor Emily Simonoff and Professor Dinesh Bhugra explain that although ADHD is more common in adults than we previously thought, it must be diagnosed by a professional with expertise in adult ADHD.

a young girl holding a leaf

Professor Simonoff, Director of the King’s Maudsley Partnership, said: “It may be helpful for some people to complete online screening questionnaires to help them determine if some of the things they’re experiencing might be related to ADHD, but the next step would be to get a professional opinion.”

Follow Us

For the latest updates and news, follow us on our social channels.

Skip to content